Players get better, refs get worse

Chiefs Highlanders just another example of officialdom mediocracy. The rules need to be improved sure, but still refs who just arent up to it, and commentators who are seemingly clueless in front of millions.
Tell me if i'm wrong here but a charge down is ruled as "carried back"? seriously? Matt Cooper? ex All Black? Obviously if the defending team take the ball back and the charge down occurs in goal it will be attacking ball, but a charge down outside the ingoal that goes over the line is classified as carried back? Thats a new one for me.
Then the Horrell reach for the line...why oh why did the clown with the whistle blow when he wasnt sure if it was a try, when the resulting action of play hadnt finished? The Highlanders had managed to clear the ball downfield yet he blew to go to the tmo instead of waiting for the current play to stop. Result?...no try, and a 5m defensive scrum. No great advantage there. And think if the ball hadnt rolled 3" forward there wouldnt have been a knock on so the ref would have had no play to rule on so no restart option available. Goon.
Then Wilson waxing lyrical about Nonu....oh hes tried so hard all night, the play just hasnt gone his way. What a load of bullshit. He was lazy lazy Nonu. Lazy in attack, lazy in support, lazy in defence, and some terrible terrible passes to boot.

Does no one else see the current state of the game? Incredible athletes taking the game to another level but wk after wk refs, linesmen and tmos getting it oh so wrong.

Current AB backline...

Anytime the Bulls are winning means theres something not right in rugby. Commentators talked bout the possession difference but steyn kicked every ball away. Such a simple gameplan from the crusaders. Passing the ball from side to side with a fatty (normally Franks or Crockett) taking it up in midfield before Ellis quickly redistributed to Carter (who simply doubled round the midfield ruck all game) to continued to feed the ball the same way. Result was side to side play from the crusaders with one ruck centre field each time. That tired out the Bulls' pack, and coupled with a safer game in their own quarter complemented by belief and confidence in their own setpiece took away the bulls' one and only game. Made it look easy. Good to see Carter back on his game, too.


Try pick a nz super backline on current form:

9 dont think anyone in world rugby comes close to kerr-barlow at the moment. Followed by perenara and weepu, weepu would get nod as back up simply because perenara's game too similar to kerr-barlow.
10 before last wkd's games i'd have said cruden perhaps backed up by noakes. Blues backs are nigh on unstoppable so the 1st5 gets credit even though his defence is suspect. Now it's all carter backed up by cruden OR slade (reliable, minimal error rate and trustworthy defender). Barrett doesnt get a look in and never should have in my opinion. And too much of a turnstyle in defence. Maybe with age his time will come but he doesnt merit being called an AB.
12 Dont know bout this one. One option is Cruden at 10, Carter at 2nd. Highlanders' Burleigh looks good as does Blues 2nd5 Saiili. Nonu...lazy lazy lazy.
13 Great as nanai williams has been he will and has been found out vs big centres. Conrad smith has been made to look like a boy defensively on 2 or 3 occasions. Rene Ranger is the go here.
11/14 Watching Gear and Savea battle it out for the AB spots has been great. Gear is hard as nails....and not a small boy. Doubt there's many players that hurt more to tackle than him. Savea has upped his skill level and it's been incredible watching him leap for high balls and including deft chips in his game. Cant look outside these 2.
15 Tell me a better fullback around on current form than Piutau.

Ideas?

ouch

 

just doubled his pay

Hansen seems to have a very dry humour which is often aimed at the press who are just searching for any to comment to take out of context. Often i have read an article on Hansen said this or that and once read seen it was nothing at all like implied in the heading. I'm sure it was just hansen keeping his mouth shut til after the judiciary....fair enough but he should have at least mentioned it looked serious, though the English press dont have to look out of their own backyard to find that kind of crap every wkd. People find it easy to knock the ABs but they just learn to take it as a form of respect, the game of rugby would have half its worldwide profile without them. For all the criticism they get for playing the game better than anyone AND in the most entertaining style of all. For all the criticism they got post 95 when not one player moaned about being sick, when they deserved respect for getting out there and playing, when they deserved to take home that cup. All the comments through time of the arrogance of the All Blacks are totally unfounded....you will not find a more humble sportsman than a Kiwi sportsman.

When the (before mccaw snatched that mantle) #1 ranked AB of all time, Pinetree Meads, and rugby's #1 gentleman, Sir Brian Lochore, both succumbed to the bug, and both stood up and defended the team....however it happened, it cant be denied. Last time it came out post game, they got criticism, this time it came out pre game(difficult to keep secret when the press are everywhere) and the ABs still cant win a trick with many fans and international press. Everyone knows a stomach bug saps your strength and not one of those players would of been at 100% by the time the match rolled round. But not one AB lamented the fact. Their reward?...yet more crap trolled out around the world all from haters JUST because they are so good. Yes, the poms played well, yes they put the ABs under pressure,...but observe some reality....England arent the best team to put the ABs under pressure this season, and pressure is nothing new to them. The uncharacteristic trait for that game was error after error...missed tackles, dropped balls, botched lineouts, some rough scrum calls(I'd argue NZ had the wood on the English scrum), and for a team that has such self belief in its own defensive system so many ruck penalties.

Whether you think the ABs were affected by any virus you hopefully make up your own mind without reading the dribble & vitriol that comes out of the english press. From what happened on the field the English clearly deserved their win. Some scribes will try to gloss over their pitiful season with this result, and maybe in such an appalling season where they played such appalling rugby....one swallow does make their winter. I will say this....great result for world rugby. I dare say even AIG is happy.

Round Up Week 1

Wayne Barnes sucks.  Nigel Owens sucks.  Glen Jackson sucks.  Craig Joubert sucks.  The frog twat who reffed the ABs Scots sucks.

Please come back, Lyndon

 



These are the world's best?  Rugby deserves better.  Players can't go for an intercept now because if you don't take the ball you are going to receive a yellow card.  What player going for an intercept seriously isn't trying to catch the ball?  You can't tackle anyone without someone calling spear tackle.  The TMOs finally seem to be getting more decisions right than wrong regarding try or no try....but sometimes they make it so confusing with their conformity of phrases that they don't get the best decision.  Even when no try is given the following play should result from whatever the last action was.  The TMOs being used in European club rugby for foul play etc is a good thing....but make some decisions with 1 ounce of grey matter involved.  Players are getting carded or penalised just for committing normal rugby actions,...challenging to catch high balls and making committed tackles that look late under slowmotion replay.  The week gone by, TMO asked to check a challenge answered "There was contact"....result...hmmmmm.... rugby player got penalised because there was contact?  Rugby players are sometimes lambasted for not being the most intelligent men on earth, but they are still a couple of rungs above rugby referees especially those in the boardroom making more stupid decisions.  Why on Earth does a TMO not have a split screen when making decisions?  Instead of watching the same action over and over from 3 or 4 different angles trying to piece together pieces of information regarding where his foot was when the ball touched down, have all 3 or 4 camera angles on the screen at one time.  Hardly rocket science but well beyond the grasp of the idiots running  rugby officialdom.

Interesting press reports saying Italy had a comfortable win over Tonga.  Then what the hell was I watching?  The curtain raiser?  Italy have gone rocketing downhill since losing Berbizier.  Why give Kirwan the go ahead to bravely transform the Azzurri game, bring in Berbizier to continue on the same path....then take a South African coach?  Mallet deserves credit for the development plans he helped put in place but the FIR needs 1 giant kick up the arse for taking him on as head coach.  My insider info told me why.  After an extremely weak 2007 Boks lucky numbered their way to World Cup Champs the Italian Federation suddenly believed to be the best at rugby you had to be bigger then the rest....you had to be the model of the blonde haired blue eyed 6ft 4" Jarpy.  To enter an academy here 18yr olds had to already be 85kg and 1.85m.  Brainless.  New Zealand's new find at halfback or the extremely talented Cruden would never get a look in.  The Italians looked woeful and their only chance at keeping the score down this weekend is infringe their arses off coupled with more incompetent reffing.  But going on what the ABs still managed to do to a continuously ruck violating Scots it doesn't bode well.

 

Naqelevuki...125kg??...No,...a mere 113

The Fijians came out firing as you expect the island teams to do....pity it only lasted about 15 minutes.  Shocked to see pregame stats list the Fijian 2nd5 as 19stone 4lb and 6ft 4"...Naqelevuki or something like that.  I saw he was big but someone somewhere along the line is either having a laugh, a wet dream, or getting their little brain all confused.  Being rugby I'd go with the 3rd option.  No surprise to see the Poms run away with it but I'd have liked the Fijians to be a bit more in the game.  Suppose the English backs will think they are an attackign machine now.  Please get rid of Toby Flood.  And Stuart Barnes while you're at it.  For a former flyhalf he really has little clue much of the time.

Awful Wales.  This is a warning for all Northern Hemisphere sides.  The Pumas are now playing the Rugby Championship year in year out.  That means very soon it will read 1,2,3 & 4 the world rankings all from the South.  Wales tried to run themselves to victory and never looked like pulling it off.  They may not be able to go up the middle versus the Pumas but they should have been attacking 1st & 2nd channels trying to make room out side for their classy wings.  That will be a demoralsing loss and interesting to see if they can pick themselves up fast enough.

 

My man of the match, Cousin Strauss

What did I say about Ireland?  They have to play for more than their customary 30minutes.  Well,...I suppose they did....they managed to etch out 40.  The Boks looked terrible before they arrived in Europe and they looked terrible on Saturday.  They need a 1st5,...badly.  And when will officialdom finally crack down on their highly & obviously illegal mauling tactics?  Oh wait...rugby officialdom...probably never.  Did love the Irish jerseys though. 

 

Tackle these

Always knew the Wallabies were gonna be up against it here.  If you were gonna bet on any game it had to be this one and it had to be the Frogs.  The French pack are some hardnosed boys and the Aussie pack were never going to survive this.  I do think Owens was too harsh on them, any scrum that went down was an instant penalty to the French but a few times on such a shoddy surface it really seemed 6 of one and half a dozen of the other.  The game was lost here on taking the ball into contact alone.  The Australians seemed hesitant, the French carried it with gusto.  Nathan Sharpe is the worst of all.....though he isn't hesitant....he's just cumbersome.  He's a lock from the 70s with no place in today's game.  Surprised Kafer, for one normally so astute at explaining the gameplay, heaped so much criticism on Beale.  A wet surface with a a struggling pack, what is a 1st5 supposed to do?  Beale, along with Cummins, carried the ball to the line much more physically than most of the Aussie forwards.  Shame Aussie didn't play the whole game like they did the last 10minutes.  Barnes had a big hand in that and I have no idea why he wasn't brought on earlier.  Big up Picamoles....love the guy.  Glad to see that maybe he has unsettled Harinordoquy as the first choice #8.  And just can't believe the size of that guy's thighs.  What a nightmare for any defender.  Wrong call Owen's & co., for saying IF they had got a number Rob Simmons would have been sent off.  The tackle was slightly late but Simmons was head down making the tackle...he wouldn't have seen the player lose the ball.  And it was not a spear tackle.  But hey,...we have to expect soft decisions from Owens.  As the great Tana once said, "This isn't tiddly winks we're playing ref".

Black tide of support

 

I'm not even going to google for that ref's name.  He deoesn't deserve a mention.  The Scots' gameplan was evident from the start.  Infringe as mush as we can and hope like buggery we get away with it.  I'd call it a success.  Most NZ rucks there was a Scotsman lying, yes lying, on the ground arms stretched out over the tackled player and attempting to hold the ball, or a stray boot from a prone player swinging (very clearly) at the ball.  That is why Adam Thomson "tapped" Strokosch's headgear with his toes.  Mere frustration at reffing incompetency.  Strokosch was lying full body on the ball on New Zealand's side of the ruck.  He knows it, knows he was in the wrong and that's why post game he said to Mr Thomson, "Don't worry about it...it was nothing!".  Surely the yellow card is more than enough punishment for that misdemeanour.  All credit to the ABs for implementing their gameplan regardless of the Jocks' negative efforts.  While it wasn't all smooth sailing, and the defence will have to be looked at, what we saw there was the best example of what the All Blacks are trying to do with their rugby these days.  The ruck ball was lightning quick, the passes under pressure were a delight to watch and the speed with which they get width on the ball is a killer for any opposition.  Some of their play was just marvellous to watch.  Wish we were playing France.

the November Internationals

So here we go again. The Southern Hemisphere's "Big 3" venture north yet again to remind Europe who wears the trousers.  Well...something we already know...it isn't South Africa or Australia.  New Zealand have nothing at all to be worried about.  Meanwhile the world's #2 and 3 ranked teams have slipped to Northern Hemisphere standards.

Australia is playing for their #2 spot, Robbie Deans' future, World Cup seeding, and perhaps above all, their pride.  The fact that Nathan Sharpe is still there, even got near 100 tests, is proof enough of how little depth they have. With a never ending flow of injuries to a team with the softest pack in tier 1 this tour is going to be a big ask.  It is a chance for many unknown Kiwis to step up and make a name for themselves but even a fullstrength Wallabies always had problems returning home from the north unbeaten.  The first up game vs the Frogs is going to test them severely.  No secret the French are going to attempt to steamroll them upfront, and the number 1 tactic will be their infamous dark, dirty play to put any green Wallaby into hesitancy mode.  This game is make or break for their tour.  One way traffic here could put the doom and gloom into the squad for the rest of the tour.  With the Poms the week after there will be no let up.  The English will know where to hit them and exactly where it hurts after a bruising battle with Les Bleu.  For all England's endeavour to open up their game all their backs can do is crab across field so it has to be a hark back to the dull old days for them.  It could be that the hurting Wallabies return home with the solitary scalp under their arms versus a going backwards Italian team.  By the time they get to Wales somehow one feels there will be yet more players on the sideline and the Scarlets are going to give them a mix of everything.  The Welsh pack will take it to them while the backs will open up and try to run the tired Wallabies ragged.  Their long season is just going to get longer yet maybe the longest part will be the long flight home.

South Africa may not fare much better.  Struck by injuries to key players and mainstays they will also have their work cut out to leave Europe with their egos intact.  The Irish will be pumped for this but they're going to have to man up for longer than their customary 30minutes.  They will confront the Boks through their pack and I'm sure try to open up but with not much more idea than the English backline this could be 1 game lacking anything regarding penetration.  The Scots will be buoyed by their recent form against the men from the republic but the Scottish backs are going to have to perform better defensively than they have been domestically.  This match alone is worth watching to see Richie Gray in full flight, and if Denton only gets a bench spot you know they have a classy backrow.  But to have a real shot at this....the Jocks will be praying for rain.  Surely England have the best shot here and will almost be 50/50 odds in Britain to get one over the Boks here.  Another injury struck team cóming to the final hurdle at the end of a long season and I don't know if the Boks have it in them.

The All Blacks.  The ABs have nothing to worry about.  No, as far as rugby goes they haven't looked good when it comes to executing their gameplan.  But how comfortable do they look versus their challengers for the top ranked spot.  So comfortable that they have almost treated the Rugby Championship as a training run.  Implementing their wanted game, then closing down the opposition when having trouble executing.  New Zealand really do have 30-40% more than what we have seen this year.  Scary stuff for any potential foe.  Hansen has his critics but I'm a fan.  He doesn't suffer fools,and  relates well with his team managing to be one of the boys yet commanding respect when needed.  The players know....perform or you sit on the bench or miss the match day 22 (soon to be 23).  He has introduced 9 new caps during a dynamite season and the powder is still dry.  Can't believe the crap about an "ageing All Blacks"....take out the 2 hookers and it's a very young team.  The player management has paid dividends with a relatively injury free season and all players are feeling fresh and chomping at the bit to start this tour....a far cry from their Southern counterparts.  The Scots could be looking down the end of one very long barrel here. The Italians will be just a small judderbar, their negativity doing nothing to stem an all black tide.  The Welsh have the best shot by far at tipping over the rugby giants but even that would go down as one of sports greatest upsets.  While the English have no show....their forwards can't and won't dominate the men in black, and their backline tendency to slide across field means Lassie could sort out the ABs defensive plan.